Philip K Dick Cracked Reality Theory: Did He Predict the Mandela Effect and Multiple Timelines?

The CIA Opened His Mail After He Said Reality Is Programmed

Back in 1977, a science fiction writer stood in front of an audience in Metz, France and said something nobody expected. Philip K Dick didn’t give a normal speech about his novels or writing process. He told them we’re living in a programmed reality where the past gets changed and new timelines branch off from old ones. Some people in the crowd laughed. Others felt chills. Within months, government agencies had opened files on him. A few years later, he died right before the film Blade Runner premiered.

The strange part? Everything Dick described in that speech lines up with things we now call the Mandela Effect, false memories, and deja vu. Millions of people remember events differently from how they happened. They swear the Monopoly Man had a monocle when he never did. They remember Nelson Mandela dying in prison decades before his death in 2013. The evidence keeps piling up that something weird happens with our memories and our sense of what’s real.

This isn’t some conspiracy theory blog post. Dick’s speech from 1977 laid out a framework for understanding reality shifts before anyone had language for these experiences. His ideas about lateral time, programmers changing variables, and overlapping worlds give us tools to understand what millions now experience but struggle to explain. Let’s break down what he said and why it matters more now than ever.

Who Was Philip K Dick and Why Did Government Agencies Watch Him?

Philip K Dick wrote 44 novels and 121 short stories during his 27-year career. His work explored fake realities, hidden powers, and worlds where nothing is what it seems. Books like “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” became the film Blade Runner. “The Man in the High Castle” showed an alternate timeline where the Axis powers won World War II. His stories felt too real, too specific about things that hadn’t happened yet.

Dick himself confirmed the government watched him. In March 1974, the CIA opened his mail and the FBI kept files on him. He knew his house was under surveillance. Someone broke in, smashed everything, and took his papers. His files were blown open and windows broken. For a science fiction writer, this seems extreme. Why would intelligence agencies care about made-up stories?

The answer gets uncomfortable when you look at what Dick wrote about. He described manufactured realities, mind control, and systems designed to keep people from seeing the truth. Dick believed we live in a world where “spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups.” His work suggested he understood something about reality programming that wasn’t supposed to be public knowledge. When he gave that speech in 1977, he crossed a line from fiction into territory that got attention from the wrong people.

The 1977 Speech That Changed Everything

Dick stood in front of that French audience and told them reality works differently than we think. Most people assume all change happens in linear time from past to present to future. We think the present builds from the past and the future grows from the present. Dick said there’s another axis of time perpendicular to the one we know. Changes happen sideways in reality, not forward. When a variable gets reprogrammed, a new timeline branches off and we start living in that updated version instead.

The crowd didn’t know what to make of this. Some laughed because it sounded absurd. How do you change the past without a time machine? How do we move sideways through realities we’re already inside? Dick admitted the idea seems impossible to grasp, but he insisted it happens all the time. We just don’t notice because our memories adjust along with the timeline shift.

He asked what clues we should look for if this theory is true. What would we experience if variables in the past get changed and new realities branch off? His answer: we’d feel deja vu, we’d have false memories of things that never happened in this timeline, and we’d notice small details that don’t match what we remember. Objects would be in wrong places. Events we swear happened would have no record. Entire groups of people would share identical false memories about the same events.

Understanding Philip K Dick Reality Theory and Orthogonal Time

Dick called his concept “orthogonal time” or “right-angle time.” Think of regular time as a straight line moving forward. Orthogonal time moves at a 90-degree angle to that line. Changes in orthogonal time don’t move us forward or backward. They move us sideways into alternate versions of the present.

Here’s where it gets wild. Dick said when a programmer (his word for whatever intelligence runs reality) changes a variable in the past, it creates a new branch. The old timeline doesn’t disappear. It becomes material for building the new one. People living through the change experience it as reliving the same segment of time, but in a slightly different version. Your memories from the old timeline sometimes bleed through, creating that weird feeling that something is off.

Most people dismiss these feelings and move on. You reach for a light switch in a different spot than you remember. You go to adjust a car vent you’re sure used to be there but find nothing. Dick said these are reflexes from another timeline. Your body remembers something your conscious mind no longer has access to. The habit remains even after the timeline shifted.

The Painting Analogy That Makes It Click

Dick gave a simple example to help people understand. Picture a painting hanging on a wall. Instead of replacing the whole painting when changes are needed, servants secretly alter details on the same canvas. They remove a tree here, add a girl there, shift small elements around. When the owner looks at the painting, he sees something familiar but different. His brain struggles because it’s the same painting but not the same.

This is how reality works according to Dick’s theory. The programmer doesn’t delete everything and start over. Small changes get made to the existing structure. Most people never notice because the adjustments feel natural. But sometimes the changes are big enough that residual memories from the old version persist. You remember the tree that’s no longer in the painting. You swear the girl wasn’t there before. Other people share your memory, which makes you question whether you’re crazy or if something real happened.

The painting stays on the wall the whole time. From the programmer’s perspective outside of time, all versions exist simultaneously. But for us living inside linear time, we experience each version one at a time, sometimes catching glimpses of previous iterations.

How Dick Experienced Multiple Realities in 1974

Everything Dick theorized became personal in February 1974. After dental surgery, a delivery person came to his door wearing a Christian fish symbol necklace. Sunlight hit the necklace and Dick saw a flash of pink light. From that moment, his life changed completely. He started receiving what he described as downloads of information directly into his mind. The pink beam carried structured knowledge, not random thoughts or imagination.

The information saved his son’s life. Dick suddenly knew his infant son had an undiagnosed medical condition. He insisted doctors check for it. They found the problem and treated it. Without that knowledge from the pink beam experience, his son might have died. This proved to Dick the experience wasn’t fantasy or hallucination. Real information from an external source had entered his mind.

For weeks after, Dick lived in two overlapping realities simultaneously. He experienced California in 1974 and ancient Rome in the first century at the same time. He felt like he was both himself and a Christian slave living under Roman persecution. Time had folded, creating two tracks of history running parallel, with his consciousness able to perceive both.

The Pink Beam Experience That Saved His Son

Dick described the pink beam as a carrier wave for information. It wasn’t just light. It contained philosophy, theology, science, and knowledge too complex for him to have invented. He called the source of this transmission VALIS, which stands for Vast Active Living Intelligence System. VALIS became the subject of his later novels where he tried to work out what had happened to him.

The medical diagnosis for his son convinced Dick he hadn’t imagined anything. He had no medical training. There was no logical way for him to know about a specific undiagnosed condition. Yet the information came through clearly and turned out to be accurate. Doctors confirmed it and saved the child’s life. Dick saw this as proof that an intelligence outside normal reality had contacted him.

This experience changed how Dick viewed his own fiction. He realized his novels about fake realities, overlapping worlds, and hidden powers weren’t pure imagination. They were subliminal memories breaking through from other timelines. His fiction documented alternate realities he had somehow accessed, even before he consciously understood what was happening. The themes repeated across 27 years of writing because he was tapping into something real.

Living in Two Timelines at Once

During those weeks in early 1974, Dick said his consciousness moved between two distinct realities. California 1974 felt real. Ancient Rome in the first century felt equally real. He wasn’t daydreaming or fantasizing. Both realities had full sensory detail and internal logic. He experienced himself as Philip K Dick and as a Christian slave, sometimes within the same moment.

This matches his theory about lateral time. If multiple versions of reality exist stacked like film transparencies, then someone under the right conditions might perceive more than one at once. The veil between timelines became thin for Dick. He saw through to another version where history had taken a different path. From his perspective, both timelines were equally valid and equally present.

Dick believed the Roman timeline might be the “true” reality and our modern world the constructed overlay. He suggested that spiritually, we still live under Roman rule and persecution, hidden beneath layers of programming that make us think we’re free. Whether you buy this specific interpretation or not, Dick’s experience shows how reality might feel if you became aware of multiple timelines running simultaneously.

The Programmer Theory Behind Our Reality

Dick used the metaphor of a chess game to explain how reality works. Two players sit across from each other. One represents a dark destructive force. The other represents the guiding intelligence Dick called the programmer. On the surface, it looks like the dark player is winning. Pieces get captured, positions deteriorate, and control shifts to the opponent.

But the game is already structured so the programmer wins. Every move the dark player makes has been anticipated. What looks like loss is part of a larger sequence leading to inevitable victory. The programmer sees the whole board, sees every possible move, and has chosen the variables in advance. The outcome is decided before the game ends.

People sense this structure, which is why they pray to be on the winning side. Being left out means staying stuck with the losing player in a darker version of reality. But even when the dark force seems clever and appears to dominate short term, it’s already defeated. It’s blind to the full pattern. Only the programmer sees how all the pieces fit together.

The Chess Game Metaphor Explained

This metaphor answers why bad things happen if a benevolent intelligence programs reality. The dark player must be allowed to make moves. Free will requires actual choices with real consequences. But those choices operate within a structure where good ultimately wins. Each timeline shift brings us closer to that predetermined victory.

When variables get changed and new realities branch off, it’s because the programmer is optimizing the game. A move didn’t work out perfectly, so adjustments happen. The past gets reprogrammed, a new timeline starts, and we live through that segment again with different variables. From outside time, the programmer sees the results instantly. From inside time, we experience it as reliving a period we’ve been through before.

This is why deja vu feels so specific. You’ve said these exact words before. You’ve heard this exact response. The moment replays perfectly because you’re literally going through the same segment of time again after variables got adjusted. Your memory from the previous iteration bleeds through, creating that eerie feeling of repetition.

Why Variables Get Changed in Our Timeline

Dick argued that reality shifts happen to improve outcomes. The programmer doesn’t make changes randomly. Each new timeline is slightly better than the previous one. More freedom, more beauty, more love, more order. The adjustments push reality toward the good, even when individual moments feel chaotic or painful.

The old universe becomes raw material for the new one. What looks like fragments or chaos in one timeline is foundation for the next. Nothing goes to waste. Each iteration builds on previous versions, gradually refining the whole structure. We’re living in a process of continuous improvement that happens outside our normal perception of time.

Dick believed we should look for people who remember worse versions of the world. If his theory is correct, memories of darker timelines would sometimes persist. People would recall more oppression, less freedom, worse conditions than currently exist. These memories would feel real because they are real. Those timelines existed before variables got changed and new branches formed.

Philip K Dick Reality Theory and the Mandela Effect Connection

The term “Mandela Effect” didn’t exist until 2009. Researcher Fiona Broome coined it after discovering she and many others vividly remembered Nelson Mandela dying in prison during the 1980s. They remembered news coverage, his widow’s speech, even riots in some cities. But Mandela was released from prison in 1990, became president of South Africa, and died in 2013. The false memory was detailed, consistent across thousands of people, and completely wrong.

Broome created a website for people to share similar experiences. The response exploded. Thousands of people reported memories that don’t match recorded history. They remember the Berenstain Bears spelled as Berenstein. They remember the Monopoly Man wearing a monocle when he never did. They recall movie lines differently than they were actually spoken. “Luke, I am your father” instead of “No, I am your father.”

These aren’t random mistakes spread across different people. They’re specific, shared false memories held by millions. Philip K Dick’s 1977 speech predicted this exact phenomenon 32 years before it got a name. He said when reality shifts sideways, some people retain memories from previous timelines. Those memories feel completely real because they are memories of real experiences, just from a version of reality we no longer occupy.

What Is the Mandela Effect and When Did It Start?

Fiona Broome discovered the phenomenon at a science fiction convention in 2009. During casual conversation, she mentioned Mandela’s tragic death in prison decades earlier. The person she talked to had the same memory. They compared details and found their false memories matched perfectly. Both remembered the same timeline that never happened in our current reality.

Research into the Mandela Effect shows it affects how people remember pop culture references, historical events, brand names, and geography. Dr. Wilma Bainbridge, a psychology professor at the University of Chicago, studies why groups share identical false memories. Her research suggests people remember what they expected to see rather than what they saw. The Monopoly Man fits stereotypes of rich old men who wear monocles, so people remember the monocle even though it never existed.

But this explanation doesn’t account for why specific false memories spread so consistently across millions of people who never communicated with each other. Dick’s theory offers another explanation. These aren’t memory errors. They’re residual memories from previous timeline iterations. The Monopoly Man had a monocle in a different version of this reality. That timeline got adjusted, variables changed, and we now live in a version where he never wore one. But the memory persists because the experience was real in the timeline we came from.

Famous Mandela Effect Examples You’ve Experienced

You probably remember several of these wrong. The Berenstain Bears children’s book series? Most people swear it was Berenstein with an E before the I. The line from Star Wars? You remember “Luke, I am your father” but the actual line is “No, I am your father.” The religious text many know says “the lion shall lie down with the lamb” but check any Bible and you’ll find it says “the wolf shall lie down with the lamb.”

Geography shifts confuse people too. Many remember New Zealand being northeast of Australia when it’s southeast. They remember Sri Lanka being farther from India than it appears now. These aren’t vague impressions. People draw maps from memory and their versions don’t match current reality.

Brand names trip people up constantly. It’s Febreze, not Febreeze. It’s KitKat, not Kit-Kat. It’s Fruit Loops, not Froot Loops. Wait, check that last one. It’s Froot Loops, not Fruit Loops, but many people remember it the other way. These details feel trivial until you realize millions share the exact same “wrong” memory. Dick would say these memories aren’t wrong. They’re accurate memories from a timeline that got reprogrammed.

The Simpsons Predictions and Reality Shifts

The Simpsons animated show has aired for over three decades and made jokes that later matched real events with spooky accuracy. Years before smart watches existed, the show depicted characters using wrist devices to make phone calls. They showed Disney buying 20th Century Fox as a joke, then it happened in 2019. They drew London’s Shard building over a decade before construction began. They showed a three-eyed fish near a nuclear plant, then news outlets photographed a real three-eyed fish near a contaminated facility in Argentina.

At some point, the list gets too long to dismiss as coincidence. The show predicted a Trump presidency. They predicted the Higgs boson particle mass 14 years before discovery. They predicted the exact scenario of US curling teams beating Sweden at the Olympics. These aren’t vague prophecies stretched to fit events. They’re oddly specific visual details and scenarios that play out years or decades later.

Some people laugh it off. Others think the writers have inside information. But there’s a third option. What if the show occasionally taps into alternate timelines where these events already happened? Dick’s theory suggests that if realities overlap and variables get changed, someone under the right conditions might perceive future or parallel versions of events. The Simpsons writers might be accessing information from timelines we haven’t reached yet or from branches that exist alongside ours.

Why The Simpsons Keep Predicting the Future

The standard explanation says the show has made thousands of jokes over 800 episodes, so some are bound to come true. With enough random guesses, probability guarantees hits. The writers say they base jokes on historical trends and logical extensions of current events. Trump running for president wasn’t a wild prediction because he’d discussed it publicly for years before the episode aired.

This explanation works for some predictions but falls apart for others. How do you explain the visual details? The Shard building design drawn before architects published plans? The three-eyed fish appearing near nuclear facilities in the same way the show depicted? The specific Olympic curling victory with the same countries and same underdog narrative?

Dick would argue the writers are unconsciously accessing alternate realities. His own novels contained themes of false worlds and timeline shifts years before he consciously understood what he was writing about. He believed fiction writers sometimes document other realities without realizing it. Their “made-up” stories are subliminal memories breaking through from timelines that exist alongside ours. The Simpsons writers might be doing the same thing, accessing information from parallel branches and coding it as jokes.

Specific Examples That Came True Years Later

In 1995, the show depicted Lisa’s future and included a pointy building behind Tower Bridge in London. The Shard didn’t exist. Construction didn’t start until 2009. Yet the episode showed a building in the exact location with the exact silhouette. In 2002, an episode showed criminals gluing cotton balls to ferrets and selling them as poodles. In 2013, a real scam in Argentina did exactly the same thing.

A 2019 episode showed Joe Biden and Kamala Harris standing together. At the time, they weren’t running mates. The following year, they became the Democratic ticket and won the presidency. The timing seems too perfect to be random. The episode aired. The writers didn’t know Harris would be selected as VP. Yet there they are together in the cartoon months before the announcement.

The curling prediction from a 2010 episode matches reality almost perfectly. The show depicted Homer and Marge on a US mixed curling team beating Sweden for Olympic gold. At the 2018 Olympics in Pyeongchang, the US men’s curling team, led by John Schuster, beat Sweden 10–7 for their first-ever gold medal. The US was an underdog in both scenarios. Sweden was the strong opponent in both. The match played out the way the cartoon showed eight years earlier.

Signs You’ve Moved Between Timelines

Dick gave practical examples of how timeline shifts show up in daily life. You reach for a light switch you swear was always in a different spot. You adjust to the new position, but your hand keeps going to the wrong place out of habit. You open your car and reach for an air vent you’re certain used to be there, but there’s just flat dashboard. These reflexes come from muscle memory formed in a previous timeline.

Dreams offer another clue. You dream of people and places you’ve never seen in waking life, yet they feel completely familiar. The details are vivid and specific, not vague dream logic. Dick suggested these dreams might be memories bleeding through from alternate versions of your life. In another timeline, you do know those people. Those places are part of your daily routine.

Deja vu ranks as the strongest evidence most people experience. That moment when the present feels like an exact replay of something you’ve lived before. You’re having a conversation and you know what the other person will say next. You’ve been in this room, had this thought, heard these words before. Standard neuroscience explains deja vu as a glitch where your brain processes the present as memory. Dick offered a different explanation. You have lived this moment before, in a previous iteration of the timeline before variables got changed.

Deja Vu as Evidence of Reality Shifts

Most people experience deja vu and forget it quickly. The feeling passes, life continues, and you chalk it up to a brain hiccup. Dick insisted these moments deserve attention. If his theory is correct, deja vu happens when two timelines overlap. You’re living through a segment of time you’ve experienced in a previous version of reality.

The past got reprogrammed. Variables changed. A new timeline branched off. But you retained some memory from the old iteration. When you reach that point in the new timeline, your consciousness recognizes it. The feeling of repetition is accurate. You’re literally repeating a sequence you’ve been through before, with slightly different variables in place.

Some deja vu experiences feel more intense than others. When the feeling is strong and the details match perfectly, it might indicate a smaller gap between timelines. The adjustment was minor, so more of your memory carried over. When deja vu is vague, it suggests bigger changes happened and less memory persisted from the previous version.

False Memories That Feel Too Real

The difference between a regular false memory and a Mandela Effect experience is consistency across groups. One person misremembering something is normal. Millions of people misremembering the same detail the same way is strange. According to Dick’s theory, these aren’t errors. They’re accurate memories from a timeline we previously occupied.

You remember Shazaam, the 1990s movie where comedian Sinbad played a genie. You remember seeing it as a kid. Other people remember the same movie with the same plot and the same actor. But check the records and you’ll find no such movie exists. There’s Kazaam with Shaquille O’Neal playing a genie, but no Shazaam with Sinbad. Yet thousands of people have detailed memories of a movie that has no record in our current timeline.

Dick would say Shazaam existed in a previous version of reality. Variables got changed, a new timeline formed, and in this version Sinbad never made that movie. But the people who saw it in the old timeline retained the memory even after shifting to the new one. The memory feels real because it is real. The experience happened. You just don’t live in that version of reality anymore.

What This Means for Your Understanding of Reality

If Dick’s theory holds any truth, reality is far more flexible than we assume. The past isn’t fixed. The present isn’t the only version running. Multiple timelines exist stacked alongside each other, and under certain conditions we move between them. The shifts usually happen so smoothly we don’t notice. Our memories adjust automatically. But sometimes the adjustment is incomplete and residual memories persist.

This doesn’t mean reality is fake or that nothing matters. It means the structure is more complex than linear time suggests. Your choices still have consequences. Your actions still shape the world around you. But the game board is bigger than you thought, with more pieces in play across multiple iterations.

Understanding this framework changes how you interpret strange experiences. Deja vu becomes evidence rather than a glitch. False memories shared by millions become data points rather than errors. The Mandela Effect becomes a glimpse behind the curtain, showing us the mechanism by which reality gets updated and optimized over time.

Frequently Asked Questions About Reality Theory

People always ask whether Dick was mentally ill or if his experiences were drug-induced. Dick did struggle with mental health issues and used amphetamines during parts of his life. But his 1974 experiences happened while he was sober, and the information he received proved accurate when it saved his son’s life. Dismissing everything he said because of his struggles ignores the parts that stand up to scrutiny.

Another common question is why everyone doesn’t remember timeline shifts if they’re real. Dick’s theory suggests most people’s memories adjust completely when variables change. The programmer wipes the old version as promised in religious texts about the new earth where “the memory of former things will not enter the mind.” But the process isn’t perfect. Some people retain fragments, creating the Mandela Effect and similar phenomena.

People wonder if we’re living in a simulation. Dick’s terminology about programmers and variables sounds like computer language, but he was speaking metaphorically. He believed in an intelligence outside time that structures reality, but he framed it in theological terms as much as technological ones. Whether you call it God, the programmer, or a simulation designer, the concept describes an organizing force that determines which version of reality becomes actualized.

How to Spot Reality Changes in Your Own Life

Start paying attention to deja vu instead of dismissing it. When the feeling hits, note the details. What are you doing? Who are you with? What happens next? If the moment plays out exactly as you remembered, write it down. Track whether these experiences cluster around certain times or situations.

Compare your memories with others, especially for events you feel certain about. When you find discrepancies, dig deeper instead of assuming you’re wrong. Look up the facts. Check multiple sources. You might find your “wrong” memory is shared by thousands of other people, which suggests something more than individual error.

Notice physical inconsistencies in familiar environments. Light switches in wrong spots. Objects missing you swear used to be there. Habits your body remembers but your mind doesn’t. These small disconnects are where timeline shifts show up most clearly. Don’t rationalize them away. Collect them as data points.

The goal isn’t paranoia or constant questioning of reality. It’s developing awareness of how fluid the structure might be. Dick spent his life exploring these questions through fiction before experiencing them directly. His work gives us a framework for understanding experiences that millions share but struggle to explain. Whether his theory perfectly describes reality or not, it offers tools for interpreting phenomena that mainstream explanations don’t adequately address.

Reality might be stranger and more flexible than we’ve been taught. Philip K Dick figured this out in 1977 and tried to tell us. The CIA and FBI took notice. He died before Blade Runner premiered. But his ideas survived and now make more sense than ever as the Mandela Effect, deja vu experiences, and shared false memories spread across millions of people worldwide. The question isn’t whether he was right about everything. The question is whether we’re ready to consider the possibility that he was right about some of it.

AI Generated SEO Notes and Strategies

Meta Title: Philip K Dick Reality Theory: Mandela Effect & Multiple Timelines Explained

Meta Description: Science fiction writer Philip K Dick predicted the Mandela Effect in 1977 speech before his death. Learn how his reality theory explains false memories, deja vu, timeline shifts, and why the CIA watched him. Discover the connection between orthogonal time, The Simpsons predictions, and shared false memories affecting millions. Explore evidence you’ve moved between parallel realities.

Tags: philip k dick reality theory, mandela effect explained, multiple timelines theory, orthogonal time concept, false memories shared, deja vu timeline shifts, simpsons predictions true, parallel realities evidence, valis experience 1977, alternate timeline memories

Long-tail Tags: philip k dick 1977 speech multiple realities, how mandela effect proves timeline shifts, why do millions share false memories, signs you moved between parallel timelines, simpsons predictions philip k dick connection

AI Strategies for Additional Consideration

Strategy 1: Create pillar content around Philip K Dick’s major works and theories, linking to this article from pages covering “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “The Man in the High Castle,” and VALIS. Internal links should use anchor text like “Dick’s reality theory” or “timeline shift predictions.”

Strategy 2: Develop comparison content matching Dick’s 1977 predictions against modern Mandela Effect research. Link to authoritative psychology sources like Dr. Wilma Bainbridge’s research and University of Chicago studies for academic credibility. External sources: https://www.britannica.com/science/Mandela-effect, https://searchengineland.com/what-is-generative-engine-optimization-geo-444418, https://www.simplypsychology.org/what-is-the-mandela-effect.html

Strategy 3: Build FAQ schema markup around common questions like “What is the Mandela Effect,” “Who was Philip K Dick,” and “What are signs of timeline shifts.” This captures featured snippet opportunities for long-tail searches and voice queries.

Strategy 4: Create supporting content on related topics including deja vu scientific explanations, false memory research, and The Simpsons prediction analysis. Cross-link these pieces with contextual anchor text to build Back in 1977, a science fiction writer stood in front of an audience in Metz, France and said something nobody expected. Philip K Dick didn’t give a normal speech about his novels or writing process. He told them we’re living in a programmed reality where the past gets changed and new timelines branch off from old ones. Some people in the crowd laughed. Others felt chills. Within months, government agencies had opened files on him. A few years later, he died right before the film Blade Runner premiered.19

Internal linking opportunities: Link “Mandela Effect” to a glossary page. Link “The Simpsons predictions” to a detailed case study article. Link “deja vu experiences” to psychology content. Link “Philip K Dick’s 1974 experience” to a deep dive on VALIS. Link “false memories research” to citation pages with academic sources.